TUTA Personality Test Types Taken Report Paper – Assignment Help

I’m working on a psychology multi-part question and need support to help me understand better.

Class book: Psychology in Action, 12th edition, Karen Huffman

Description:

In this exercise, you will identify the different personality traits and research methods available by assessing your personality.

Objectives

  • Define personality.
  • Explain how early trait theorists approached the study of personality.
  • Describe the Big Five personality traits.
  • Summarize the major contributions and criticisms of trait theory.

Instructions:

STEP 1: Assess.

Take at least two of the personality tests mentioned in this module:

Step 2: Analyze Your Results.

Compare and contrast the two assessments you completed. Discuss the results with at least one other person who knows you (preferably someone who knows you well) and decide if you believe the results accurately describe who you are.

Step 3. Write and Reflect.

Write a 3-5 page summary of the results of the personality test and discuss whether or not you agree with them. Be sure to address the following in your paper:

  • The two assessments you selected and why
  • The results from each of the assessments
  • Your analysis of the results and whether you believe the two tests (or personality assessments in general) to be accurate
  • The connection between the two assessments and personality theories as discussed in the text
  • The pros and cons of personality assessment and whether they are overall advantageous

Step 4. Submit Your Assignment.

Your assignment should be in a Word document, written in APA format (12-point font, double spaced), and supported by research and in-text citations.

Rubric

Assignment Rubric – Universal

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas

10 pts

Ideas are clear, insightful, thought provoking, and focused; they consistently support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

8 pts

Ideas are clear and focused to support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s), but they are not consistently insightful or thought provoking.

6 pts

Ideas are clear but conventional or general; they only somewhat support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

2 pts

Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

10 pts

The assignment includes clear connections to lesson content. It includes abundant details and examples that generate interest and provide relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.

8 pts

The assignment includes clear connections to lesson content. It includes abundant details and examples that generate interest and provide relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.

6 pts

The assignment includes minimal or confusing connections to lesson content. Detail and examples are included but are general and not interesting. The assignment lacks evidence in support of sound logic.

2 pts

Connections to lesson content are not included. The assignment is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that might include logical fallacies.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Support

10 pts

Content meets or exceeds established assignment criteria. The assignment clearly presents well-reasoned notions and concepts. All content is well-supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are consistent with selected research.

8 pts

Content meets almost all of the established assignment criteria. The assignment presents fairly well-reasoned notions and concepts. All content is adequately supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are mostly consistent with selected research.

6 pts

Content is missing several important requirements of the established assignment criteria. The assignment presents notions and concepts that are only somewhat applicable. Some content is supported with scholarly resources. A few assertions are consistent with selected research.

2 pts

Content does not meet established assignment criteria and is missing most of the important requirements. The assignment presents poorly reasoned notions and concepts. Content is not supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are inconsistent with selected research.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10 pts

The assignment is focused in an organized and thoughtful manner. Content is constructed in a logical way that supports the solution to the challenge or question(s).

8 pts

The assignment is organized, but the focus could be more precise. Content is constructed in a way that mostly supports the solution or question(s).

6 pts

The assignment is lacking focus and is unorganized. Content is constructed in a way that loosely supports the solution or question(s).

2 pts

The assignment is unfocused and unorganized. Information shows no effort to support the solution to the challenge or question(s).

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Citations

10 pts

Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the purpose of the assignment. There are no grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. The correct number and type of citations are included and follow current APA format with no errors.

8 pts

Format is correct, meets most of the assignment directions, and works to support the purpose of the presentation. There are no more than three grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. The correct number and type of citations are included and follow current APA format with no more than two errors.

6 pts

Format is somewhat correct, meets some aspects of assignment directions, and works generally to support the purpose of the presentation. There are four to six grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. Citations are included, but some are missing, or the type is not appropriate. There are three to five errors in current APA format.

2 pts

Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment directions, and does not support the purpose of the presentation. There are more than seven grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. Citations are not included, and if APA formatting is evident, it contains more than six errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 50

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more