Stop and Frisk: Beyond Terry v. Ohio – Assignment Help

The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Terry v Ohio carved out an exception in regards to the 4th Amendment prohibition on unreasonable search and seizures. Essentially law enforcement official were allowed to “pat down,” or “frisk” without probable cause, someone they had stopped whom they suspected may have committed a crime or may be about to commit a crime.

In 2002 the New York Police Department began a concentrated effort to get guns off the streets and slow down violent crime. To help accomplish this they went on an extensive “Stop and Frisk” campaign that lasted for years. As you might suspect, both advocates and critics of the policy pointed to varying statistics or anecdotal evidence showing that the program was either successful or not successful.
You read one perspective in “The Inverse Relationship Between the Constitutionality and Effectiveness of New York City ‘Stop and Frisk’”(Jeffrey Bellin, Boston University Law Review). Now, share your point of view. Choose one of the questions below to respond to. You must include citation from the Bellin article in your response:
1. Does the way in which the New York City police department used the Terry v. Ohio decision keep faith with the original intent of the Supreme Court ruling? Why or why not?
2. If it can be shown that the way the New York City police department used the Terry v Ohio ruling actually resulted in the reduction of gun crime, does that justify the actions taken by the police? Why or why not?
3. The NYPD recorded an extremely high number of stops in some years. Is it possible some were legal and some were not? If so, how can you tell them apart?
4. If an officer knows that the stop and frisk campaign is illegal, but also knows that it will save lives, how should he make an ethical decision about whether or not to participate?
Respond to two classmates who chose to post about two different questions than you did. Do you agree with their point of view? Why or why not?

The post Stop and Frisk: Beyond Terry v. Ohio appeared first on ESSAY PAPER.


Stop and Frisk: Beyond Terry v. Ohio was first posted on March 14, 2021 at 10:29 pm.
©2019 "ESSAY PAPER". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at ALL ANSWERS

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more